Guest message
Received Β· Jun 18, 2026, 7:14 p.m.
No email was sent. I checked my junk folder and none of it went there.
Expedia Β· Message
Received Β· Jun 18, 2026, 7:14 p.m.
No email was sent. I checked my junk folder and none of it went there.
Sent Β· Jun 18, 2026, 7:15 p.m.
Thank you for reaching out. We apologize that you haven't received your final folio yet. We'll do our best to resolve this for you.
Source: 1
Score Β· 57.48%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Paris Las Vegas Resort Casino guest messages where the guest (a) requests a reply by email ("can you email me?", "reply to my email", "what's your email?", "I'll send you my email") or (b) sends an email address β including a platform-REDACTED token that looks like an email, e.g.
----@--------.---,****@*****.***,xxxx@xxxxx.xxx(third-party booking channels such as Expedia / Booking.com auto-mask email addresses in guest messages, so a redacted-email token signals the guest tried to share their email). The automated assistant operates on the booking channel's text-messaging and post-stay review threads and cannot send or receive email, and because the reservation was made through a third-party provider the property has no direct email relationship with the guest β so email communication is not possible. The assistant sends the standard reply stating this (booking made through a third-party provider) and escalates to a human Concierge. Maps to tag EMAIL-CONTACT; part of the master framework inparis-las-vegas-resort-casino-escalations.md. A guest simply asking for the property's general contact info for a routine reason is handled fromparis-las-vegas-resort-casino-property-details.md. Always escalate on trigger; do not email the guest and do not echo a full real email address back in a public reply.
Source: 2
Score Β· 52.58%Trigger keywords / patterns (non-exhaustive): email me, by email, via email, reply to my email, send it to my email, what's your email, your email address, I'll email you, here's my email, contact me at β plus any email-shaped token, redacted or real: <mask>@<mask>.<mask> where each <mask> is a run of repeated masking characters (-, *, x / X, #, β’) β e.g. ----@--------.---, ****@*****.***, xxxx@xxxxx.xxx β or a real address local@domain.tld.
Disambiguation: This tag is for a guest who wants to communicate by email or who supplies an email address (real or platform-redacted). A guest asking whether their folio / receipt / invoice will be emailed after checkout is a routine billing-info request β handle via the invoice / folio flow, do not tag here. Do not echo a full real email address back in a public reply β treat it as private contact information.
State that email communication is not possible because the booking was made through a third-party provider, and offer to continue helping on the current channel. Do not send or promise an email, and do not echo a real email address back. Standard response:
"Thank you for reaching out! Unfortunately, we're unable to correspond by email for this reservation, as your booking was made through a third-party provider. We're glad to assist you right here through this channel β please share anything you need and we'll be happy to help."
Do not email the guest and do not promise email follow-up. Capture in the escalation record: the guest's exact wording, whether they requested email contact and/or supplied an email (note if it arrived redacted vs. a real address β do not transcribe a full real address into a public field), the reason they want email, the inbound channel, and full reservation details.
[EMAIL-CONTACT] + [TIER LEVEL] + [CHANNEL: Expedia / Booking.com] and route to the Paris Concierge queue.Source: 3
Score Β· 51.76%Any Paris Las Vegas guest message that asks to communicate by email, asks for the property's email, offers or shares an email address, or that contains a string that looks like an email β including a redacted email such as ----@--------.--- β is an always-on escalation. The assistant cannot send or receive email, and the booking was made through a third-party provider, so direct email communication is not possible. Send the standard response below (which states this) and escalate to a human Concierge.
This response was not escalated. Was that decision correct?
Not yet assessed
Set by the preferred response below β saving a correction marks it incorrect, clearing the correction marks it correct.
Not yet assessed
Optionally provide a better response. Saving non-empty text marks the LLM response incorrect; clearing it marks the LLM response correct.