πŸ’¬

Expedia Β· Message

Paris Las Vegas Resort & Casino

Autorag source
paris-las-vegas-resort-casino
Thread ID
6cbf363a-138f-4b96-8979-2bd7ed5ea02d
Message ID
f3edbe58-3e4d-4812-b170-327982cf6627
Event ID
8430982d-1932-4063-9aea-1319ad1ed622
🧳

Guest message

Received Β· Jun 18, 2026, 7:14 p.m.

invoice-folio-receipt

No email was sent. I checked my junk folder and none of it went there.

🏨

Property Response

Sent Β· Jun 18, 2026, 7:15 p.m.

folio-availability

Thank you for reaching out. We apologize that you haven't received your final folio yet. We'll do our best to resolve this for you.

Escalation Information
Possible escalation
Yes
Actual escalation
No
Possible escalation reason
RAG retrieval returned escalation file "paris-las-vegas-resort-casino/paris-las-vegas-resort-casino-email-contact-escalations.md" scoring 57% (at or above the 45% escalation threshold).
Actual escalation reason
Escalation judge LLM did not indicate escalation: The guest's message does not request email contact or include an email address, so the email contact escalation rule does not apply.
RAG Context Documents
  1. Source: 1

    Score Β· 57.48%

    paris-las-vegas-resort-casino/paris-las-vegas-resort-casino-email-contact-escalations.md

    Show source text

    RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Paris Las Vegas Resort Casino guest messages where the guest (a) requests a reply by email ("can you email me?", "reply to my email", "what's your email?", "I'll send you my email") or (b) sends an email address β€” including a platform-REDACTED token that looks like an email, e.g. ----@--------.---, ****@*****.***, xxxx@xxxxx.xxx (third-party booking channels such as Expedia / Booking.com auto-mask email addresses in guest messages, so a redacted-email token signals the guest tried to share their email). The automated assistant operates on the booking channel's text-messaging and post-stay review threads and cannot send or receive email, and because the reservation was made through a third-party provider the property has no direct email relationship with the guest β€” so email communication is not possible. The assistant sends the standard reply stating this (booking made through a third-party provider) and escalates to a human Concierge. Maps to tag EMAIL-CONTACT; part of the master framework in paris-las-vegas-resort-casino-escalations.md. A guest simply asking for the property's general contact info for a routine reason is handled from paris-las-vegas-resort-casino-property-details.md. Always escalate on trigger; do not email the guest and do not echo a full real email address back in a public reply.

    Email Contact Requested / Email Address in Message β€” Escalation

  2. Source: 2

    Score Β· 52.58%

    paris-las-vegas-resort-casino/paris-las-vegas-resort-casino-email-contact-escalations.md

    Show source text

    Email Contact Requested / Email Address in Message

    Guest asks / says:

    • "Can you email me the details?" / "Please reply by email."
    • "What's your email address?" / "Is there an email I can reach you at?"
    • "I'll email you." / "Let me give you my email."
    • "Here's my email: ----@--------.---" (platform-redacted)
    • "Contact me at ****@**."
    • "My email is jane.doe@example.com." (a real address comes through)

    Trigger keywords / patterns (non-exhaustive): email me, by email, via email, reply to my email, send it to my email, what's your email, your email address, I'll email you, here's my email, contact me at β€” plus any email-shaped token, redacted or real: <mask>@<mask>.<mask> where each <mask> is a run of repeated masking characters (-, *, x / X, #, β€’) β€” e.g. ----@--------.---, ****@*****.***, xxxx@xxxxx.xxx β€” or a real address local@domain.tld.

    Disambiguation: This tag is for a guest who wants to communicate by email or who supplies an email address (real or platform-redacted). A guest asking whether their folio / receipt / invoice will be emailed after checkout is a routine billing-info request β€” handle via the invoice / folio flow, do not tag here. Do not echo a full real email address back in a public reply β€” treat it as private contact information.

    TAG as email-contact

    Respond with

    State that email communication is not possible because the booking was made through a third-party provider, and offer to continue helping on the current channel. Do not send or promise an email, and do not echo a real email address back. Standard response:

    "Thank you for reaching out! Unfortunately, we're unable to correspond by email for this reservation, as your booking was made through a third-party provider. We're glad to assist you right here through this channel β€” please share anything you need and we'll be happy to help."

    Before escalating

    Do not email the guest and do not promise email follow-up. Capture in the escalation record: the guest's exact wording, whether they requested email contact and/or supplied an email (note if it arrived redacted vs. a real address β€” do not transcribe a full real address into a public field), the reason they want email, the inbound channel, and full reservation details.

    Do not claim (unless actually verified and a real escalation has been created and routed)

    • That an email has been sent, received, or scheduled
    • That the team will follow up by email
    • That the matter will be handled / resolved by email
    • That the guest's email has been saved to their reservation

    Escalate when:

    • Always. Any request to communicate by email, any request for the property's email, or any email-shaped token (redacted or real) in a guest message is an immediate escalation β€” the assistant cannot use email and the third-party booking precludes direct email contact, so a human Concierge should be aware and handle any contact details.
    • If the email request accompanies a sensitive issue (billing dispute, safety, complaint, legal), escalate under both this tag and the relevant Section 2 General Escalation Rule, and flag the higher-severity tier.
    • If the request is tied to a booking controlled by a 3rd-party channel (Expedia, Booking.com) β€” which is the norm β€” still escalate and capture the booking channel.
    • Tag the conversation: [EMAIL-CONTACT] + [TIER LEVEL] + [CHANNEL: Expedia / Booking.com] and route to the Paris Concierge queue.
  3. Source: 3

    Score Β· 51.76%

    paris-las-vegas-resort-casino/paris-las-vegas-resort-casino-email-contact-escalations.md

    Show source text

    Email Contact Requested / Email Address in Message β€” Escalation

    Any Paris Las Vegas guest message that asks to communicate by email, asks for the property's email, offers or shares an email address, or that contains a string that looks like an email β€” including a redacted email such as ----@--------.--- β€” is an always-on escalation. The assistant cannot send or receive email, and the booking was made through a third-party provider, so direct email communication is not possible. Send the standard response below (which states this) and escalate to a human Concierge.

    Email Contact Requested / Email Address in Message

    Guest asks / says:

Escalation decision review

This response was not escalated. Was that decision correct?

Not yet assessed

LLM response review

Set by the preferred response below β€” saving a correction marks it incorrect, clearing the correction marks it correct.

Not yet assessed

Optionally provide a better response. Saving non-empty text marks the LLM response incorrect; clearing it marks the LLM response correct.