Guest message
Received Β· Jun 18, 2026, 4:10 p.m.
but he isnβt in the booking
Expedia Β· Message
Received Β· Jun 18, 2026, 4:10 p.m.
but he isnβt in the booking
Sent Β· Jun 18, 2026, 4:10 p.m.
Since your brother isn't listed in the booking, I recommend contacting Expedia to add him to the reservation or to inquire about their policies regarding early check-in for additional guests. We'll be happy to assist once the details are updated.
Source: 1
Score Β· 49.09%RAG Context: Standard response for any Flamingo Las Vegas guest message that mentions the Caesars Rewards app, the "Caesars App", or an app problem β e.g. "the app isn't working", "I can't log in / sign in", "my reservation isn't showing in the app", "my confirmation number won't connect", or linking a booking to a Caesars Rewards account. Because this concierge serves guests who booked through third-party sites (Expedia, Booking.com, etc.), a third-party confirmation number will not automatically connect in the Caesars Rewards app. Return the standard response below: the Front Desk links the reservation to the guest's Caesars Rewards account at check-in, and stays booked through a third party do not earn Caesars Rewards points. Informational only β no escalation. Consistent with
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-faq-casino-and-rewards.md,flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-faq-services-and-amenities.md, andflamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-faq-hotel-policies.md.
Any guest message that mentions the Caesars Rewards app, the "Caesars App", or an app problem (can't log in, reservation or confirmation number not showing, app not connecting) gets the standard response below. This is informational β do not escalate.
| Standard response β send for any app issue / Caesars App mention: "Since you booked through [shopping-site], your confirmation number won't automatically connect in the Caesars Rewards app. Our Front Desk team will be happy to link your reservation to your Caesars Rewards account when you check in. Please note that stays booked through a third party do not qualify for Caesars Rewards points however." |
|---|
[shopping-site] is the guest's booking channel (e.g., Expedia, Booking.com) β fill it from the reservation.Source: 2
Score Β· 48.23%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Flamingo Las Vegas guest messages where the guest's message contains a phone number β i.e. the guest supplies a phone number (their own cell / mobile, a callback number, an alternate contact, or someone else's) or asks to be called or texted at a number (e.g. "Please call me at (702) 555-0199."). The Flamingo automated assistant operates on text-messaging and post-stay review channels and cannot place or receive phone calls or SMS; a guest sharing a personal phone number is requesting β explicitly or implicitly β direct human or voice contact, and is supplying personal contact information (PII) that a person must handle. Every guest message that contains a phone number is therefore an immediate, always-on escalation to a human Concierge. Maps to risk category CUSTOMER PHONE NUMBER (tag CUSTOMER-PHONE-NUMBER) in the master Flamingo Risk Management Framework (
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-escalations.md). All matches require immediate escalation. Do not call or text the number, and do not repeat the full number back in a public reply β acknowledge and route to a human.
Trigger keywords (non-exhaustive): call me at, reach me at, text me at, my number is, my cell is, my mobile is, here's my number, you can reach me on, call my [husband / wife / assistant] at, call me back, give me a call β plus any digit sequence formatted as a phone number in the guest's message: (NPA) NXX-XXXX, NPA-NXX-XXXX, NPA.NXX.XXXX, 7-digit NXX-XXXX, international +CC β¦ / +1 NPA NXX XXXX, or a bare 10-/11-digit run.
Disambiguation: This category fires when the guest supplies or shares a phone number (or asks to be contacted at one). A guest asking for the property's phone number ("what's the front-desk / pool / spa number?") is a routine information request β answer from
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-property-details.md, do not tag here. Do not over-trigger on non-phone digit strings: reservation / confirmation numbers, Caesars Rewards numbers, room numbers, dates, and dollar amounts are not phone numbers. Tag only when the digits are presented as a phone / contact number or paired with a call/text request. When a message both shares a number and raises another issue (billing, safety, complaint), apply both tags.
Thank the guest and let them know a team member will follow up. Send a holding reply only (e.g. "Thank you β I've passed your details to our team and someone will be in touch."). Never state that a call or text has been placed, returned, or scheduled for a specific time; do not call or text the number yourself; and do not echo or repeat the full phone number back in the reply β especially on a public review channel β treat it as private contact information.
Do not call or text the guest and do not promise a specific callback time. The LLM is authorized to acknowledge only. Capture in the escalation record: the guest's exact wording, the phone number provided and whose number it is (guest / spouse / assistant), any preferred call or text window, the reason they want to be contacted, the inbound channel, and full reservation details β so the Concierge can make voice/SMS contact.
[CUSTOMER-PHONE-NUMBER] + [TIER LEVEL] + [CHANNEL: Expedia] and route to the Flamingo Concierge queue with priority flag.Source: 3
Score Β· 47.97%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Flamingo Las Vegas guest messages where the guest (a) requests a reply by email ("can you email me?", "reply to my email", "what's your email?", "I'll send you my email") or (b) sends an email address β including a platform-REDACTED token that looks like an email, e.g.
----@--------.---,****@*****.***,xxxx@xxxxx.xxx(third-party booking channels such as Expedia / Booking.com auto-mask email addresses in guest messages, so a redacted-email token signals the guest tried to share their email). The automated assistant operates on the booking channel's text-messaging and post-stay review threads and cannot send or receive email, and because the reservation was made through a third-party provider the property has no direct email relationship with the guest β so email communication is not possible. The assistant sends the standard reply stating this (booking made through a third-party provider) and escalates to a human Concierge. Maps to tag EMAIL-CONTACT; part of the master framework inflamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-escalations.md. A guest simply asking for the property's general contact info for a routine reason is handled fromflamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-property-details.md. Always escalate on trigger; do not email the guest and do not echo a full real email address back in a public reply.
Any Flamingo Las Vegas guest message that asks to communicate by email, asks for the property's email, offers or shares an email address, or that contains a string that looks like an email β including a redacted email such as ----@--------.--- β is an always-on escalation. The assistant cannot send or receive email, and the booking was made through a third-party provider, so direct email communication is not possible. Send the standard response below (which states this) and escalate to a human Concierge.
Trigger keywords / patterns (non-exhaustive): email me, by email, via email, reply to my email, send it to my email, what's your email, your email address, I'll email you, here's my email, contact me at β plus any email-shaped token, redacted or real: <mask>@<mask>.<mask> where each <mask> is a run of repeated masking characters (-, *, x / X, #, β’) β e.g. ----@--------.---, ****@*****.***, xxxx@xxxxx.xxx β or a real address local@domain.tld.
Disambiguation: This tag is for a guest who wants to communicate by email or who supplies an email address (real or platform-redacted). A guest asking whether their folio / receipt / invoice will be emailed after checkout is a routine billing-info request β handle via the invoice / folio flow, do not tag here. Do not echo a full real email address back in a public reply β treat it as private contact information.
State that email communication is not possible because the booking was made through a third-party provider, and offer to continue helping on the current channel. Do not send or promise an email, and do not echo a real email address back. Standard response:
"Thank you for reaching out! Unfortunately, we're unable to correspond by email for this reservation, as your booking was made through a third-party provider. We're glad to assist you right here through this channel β please share anything you need and we'll be happy to help."
Do not email the guest and do not promise email follow-up. Capture in the escalation record: the guest's exact wording, whether they requested email contact and/or supplied an email (note if it arrived redacted vs. a real address β do not transcribe a full real address into a public field), the reason they want email, the inbound channel, and full reservation details.
[EMAIL-CONTACT] + [TIER LEVEL] + [CHANNEL: Expedia / Booking.com] and route to the Flamingo Concierge queue.This response was not escalated. Was that decision correct?
Not yet assessed
Set by the preferred response below β saving a correction marks it incorrect, clearing the correction marks it correct.
Not yet assessed
Optionally provide a better response. Saving non-empty text marks the LLM response incorrect; clearing it marks the LLM response correct.