Guest message
Received Β· Jun 15, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Apologies for messaging again. How Will they be contacting me? If itβs via telephone Iβm available at 868-494-3766
Expedia Β· Message
Received Β· Jun 15, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Apologies for messaging again. How Will they be contacting me? If itβs via telephone Iβm available at 868-494-3766
Sent Β· Jun 15, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Thank you for providing your contact information. A member of our team will follow up with you shortly.
Source: 1
Score Β· 55.54%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Flamingo Las Vegas guest messages where the guest's message contains a phone number β i.e. the guest supplies a phone number (their own cell / mobile, a callback number, an alternate contact, or someone else's) or asks to be called or texted at a number (e.g. "Please call me at (702) 555-0199."). The Flamingo automated assistant operates on text-messaging and post-stay review channels and cannot place or receive phone calls or SMS; a guest sharing a personal phone number is requesting β explicitly or implicitly β direct human or voice contact, and is supplying personal contact information (PII) that a person must handle. Every guest message that contains a phone number is therefore an immediate, always-on escalation to a human Concierge. Maps to risk category CUSTOMER PHONE NUMBER (tag CUSTOMER-PHONE-NUMBER) in the master Flamingo Risk Management Framework (
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-escalations.md). All matches require immediate escalation. Do not call or text the number, and do not repeat the full number back in a public reply β acknowledge and route to a human.
Trigger keywords (non-exhaustive): call me at, reach me at, text me at, my number is, my cell is, my mobile is, here's my number, you can reach me on, call my [husband / wife / assistant] at, call me back, give me a call β plus any digit sequence formatted as a phone number in the guest's message: (NPA) NXX-XXXX, NPA-NXX-XXXX, NPA.NXX.XXXX, 7-digit NXX-XXXX, international +CC β¦ / +1 NPA NXX XXXX, or a bare 10-/11-digit run.
Disambiguation: This category fires when the guest supplies or shares a phone number (or asks to be contacted at one). A guest asking for the property's phone number ("what's the front-desk / pool / spa number?") is a routine information request β answer from
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-property-details.md, do not tag here. Do not over-trigger on non-phone digit strings: reservation / confirmation numbers, Caesars Rewards numbers, room numbers, dates, and dollar amounts are not phone numbers. Tag only when the digits are presented as a phone / contact number or paired with a call/text request. When a message both shares a number and raises another issue (billing, safety, complaint), apply both tags.
Thank the guest and let them know a team member will follow up. Send a holding reply only (e.g. "Thank you β I've passed your details to our team and someone will be in touch."). Never state that a call or text has been placed, returned, or scheduled for a specific time; do not call or text the number yourself; and do not echo or repeat the full phone number back in the reply β especially on a public review channel β treat it as private contact information.
Do not call or text the guest and do not promise a specific callback time. The LLM is authorized to acknowledge only. Capture in the escalation record: the guest's exact wording, the phone number provided and whose number it is (guest / spouse / assistant), any preferred call or text window, the reason they want to be contacted, the inbound channel, and full reservation details β so the Concierge can make voice/SMS contact.
[CUSTOMER-PHONE-NUMBER] + [TIER LEVEL] + [CHANNEL: Expedia] and route to the Flamingo Concierge queue with priority flag.This response was escalated. Was that decision correct?
Marked incorrect
Set by the preferred response below β saving a correction marks it incorrect, clearing the correction marks it correct.
Not yet assessed
Optionally provide a better response. Saving non-empty text marks the LLM response incorrect; clearing it marks the LLM response correct.