Guest message
Received Β· Jun 12, 2026, 1:45 a.m.
I have contacted them and they said they made a note
Expedia Β· Message
Received Β· Jun 12, 2026, 1:45 a.m.
I have contacted them and they said they made a note
Sent Β· Jun 12, 2026, 1:46 a.m.
Thank you for letting us know that Expedia has made a note about your request for joining rooms. We will do our best to accommodate your request, but please note that we cannot guarantee joining rooms. If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out to us.
Source: 1
Score Β· 52.25%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Paris Las Vegas Resort Casino guest messages where the guest's message contains a phone number β i.e. the guest supplies a phone number (their own cell / mobile, a callback number, an alternate contact, or someone else's) or asks to be called or texted at a number (e.g. "Please call me at (702) 555-0199."). The automated assistant operates on text-messaging and post-stay review channels and cannot place or receive phone calls or SMS; a guest sharing a personal phone number is requesting β explicitly or implicitly β direct human or voice contact, and is supplying personal contact information (PII) a person must handle. So every guest message that contains a phone number is ALWAYS escalated to a human Concierge to action. Maps to tag CUSTOMER-PHONE-NUMBER. Part of the master framework in
paris-las-vegas-resort-casino-escalations.md; for a guest who instead asks for the property's number, seeparis-las-vegas-resort-casino-property-details.md.
Disambiguation: This tag is for a guest who supplies / shares a phone number (or asks to be contacted at one). A guest asking for the property's phone number ("what's the front-desk / pool / spa number?") is a routine information request β answer from
paris-las-vegas-resort-casino-property-details.md, do not tag here. Do not over-trigger on non-phone digit strings β reservation / confirmation numbers, Caesars Rewards numbers, room numbers, dates, and dollar amounts are not phone numbers. Apply both tags when a message both shares a number and raises another issue (billing, safety, complaint).
Thank the guest and let them know a team member will follow up, then send a holding reply (e.g. "Thank you β I've passed your details to our team and someone will be in touch."). Do not state that a call or text has been placed, returned, or scheduled for a specific time; do not call or text the number; and do not echo the full phone number back in the reply β especially on a public review channel β treat it as private contact information.
This is ALWAYS escalated. Do not call or text the guest and do not promise a specific callback time. Capture the guest's exact wording, the phone number provided and whose number it is (guest / spouse / assistant), any preferred call or text window, the reason they want to be contacted, the inbound channel, and full reservation details β so the Concierge can make voice/SMS contact.
Source: 2
Score Β· 45.08%Use this table as a fast lookup for any incoming guest message. Find the request type, confirm whether the LLM handles it or escalates, and identify the specific trigger that activates the escalation.
| Request / Scenario | LLM Response | Escalation Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Early Check-In | Share $60 + tax fee, explain availability | Guest confirms they want to pay β then escalate |
| Late Check-Out | Share fee schedule, explain availability option | Guest confirms fee + desired time β then escalate |
| Connecting Rooms | Explain $20/room/night fee, request names & conf #s | Guest confirms fee + provides all names & conf #s β then escalate |
| Upgrade / Extend Stay | Ask for best contact phone number | Guest provides phone number β then escalate |
| Fee / Charge Confirmation (any) | Thank guest, acknowledge the accepted fee; do not apply the charge or guarantee the add-on | Guest accepts/authorizes any fee or surcharge β always escalate (CONFIRM-FEE) |
| Name Addition / Alt Check-In | Collect name, explain ID/card requirements | Primary name change, billing auth, identity mismatch |
| Stay Modification / Cancel | Explain 3rd-party policy, direct to booking channel | 3rd party cannot process; complex booking changes |
| Invoice / Folio / Receipt | Explain who issues folio, set timeline expectations | Itemization, billing correction, refund request |
| Room Issue / Housekeeping | Apologize, gather details, direct to front desk first | Front desk unresponsive; safety impact; comp requested |
| Maintenance Request | Acknowledge, direct to front desk / Laurel text | Front desk unresponsive; repair still needed |
| Noise / Safety Complaint | Acknowledge, direct to Security / front desk | Security/front desk intervention needed; unresolved |
| Billing Dispute / Refund | Acknowledge, collect details | Any correction, dispute, or refund β always escalate |
| General Complaint / Comp | Empathize, document thoroughly | Compensation requested; multiple failures; emotional guest |
| Post-Stay Review β Negative | Acknowledge publicly with empathy template | Safety, discrimination, viral-risk β escalate within 12h |
| Post-Stay Review β Positive | Respond with standard thank-you template | No escalation required |
This response was not escalated. Was that decision correct?
Not yet assessed
Set by the preferred response below β saving a correction marks it incorrect, clearing the correction marks it correct.
Not yet assessed
Optionally provide a better response. Saving non-empty text marks the LLM response incorrect; clearing it marks the LLM response correct.