Guest message
Received Β· Jun 17, 2026, 2:39 a.m.
Neither is my confirmation number actually
Expedia Β· Message
Received Β· Jun 17, 2026, 2:39 a.m.
Neither is my confirmation number actually
Sent Β· Jun 17, 2026, 2:40 a.m.
I apologize for the inconvenience you're experiencing with your confirmation number.
Source: 1
Score Β· 58.25%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Flamingo Las Vegas guest messages where the guest confirms, accepts, authorizes, agrees to, or approves a fee or charge β as opposed to disputing one. Covers acceptance of a quoted surcharge or add-on cost: adjoining / connecting room fees, room upgrades, early check-in or late checkout fees, resort fees, parking, pet fees, rollaway bed or extra-guest charges, extra-night charges, and any "per room / per night" or "extra fee" the guest agrees to pay (e.g. "Yes, we'd like to confirm the adjoining rooms for the extra fee of $25 per room, per night."). The LLM cannot process payments, apply charges, or guarantee paid add-ons or availability, so every confirmation must be handed to a human to action. Maps to risk category FEE & CHARGE CONFIRMATION (tag CONFIRM-FEE) in the master Flamingo Risk Management Framework (
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-escalations.md). All matches require immediate escalation. Do not confirm the charge is applied or the add-on secured β acknowledge and route to a human.
Trigger keywords (non-exhaustive): yes please confirm, we'd like to confirm, go ahead and charge, charge me, charge my card, add it to my bill, add it to my room, accept the fee, agree to the charge, agree to the fee, approve the fee, okay to charge, that's fine charge, proceed with the upgrade, confirm the extra fee, extra fee, additional charge, additional cost, surcharge, add-on, per night, per room, willing to pay, sounds good charge me, confirm the [adjoining / connecting] rooms.
Disambiguation: This category is for a guest accepting / authorizing a new or quoted charge (a forward-looking action that must be executed by a human). If the guest is disputing, questioning, or asking to remove an existing charge, that is a billing dispute β see General Escalation Rules Β§K (Billing Issues & Charge Disputes). When a message both accepts a fee and disputes another, apply both tags.
Thank the guest for confirming and acknowledge the specific fee/charge they accepted. Never state that the charge has been applied, the payment processed, or the room / upgrade / add-on secured; do not quote, adjust, or negotiate the amount, or guarantee availability. Make clear that a team member will finalize the arrangement and apply the charge. The LLM is not authorized to process payments or confirm paid add-ons.
Do not apply, process, or confirm the charge, and do not guarantee the booking change. The LLM is authorized to acknowledge and thank only. Capture the guest's exact wording in the escalation record β the specific charge accepted, the amount, the unit (per room / per night / one-time), what it is for (adjoining / connecting rooms, upgrade, pet, parking, late checkout, extra guest, rollaway, extra night), and full reservation details β so the concierge can apply the charge and confirm the arrangement.
[CONFIRM-FEE] + [TIER LEVEL] + [CHANNEL: Expedia] and route to the Flamingo Concierge queue with priority flag.Source: 2
Score Β· 56.82%RAG Context: Standard response for any Flamingo Las Vegas guest message that mentions the Caesars Rewards app, the "Caesars App", or an app problem β e.g. "the app isn't working", "I can't log in / sign in", "my reservation isn't showing in the app", "my confirmation number won't connect", or linking a booking to a Caesars Rewards account. Because this concierge serves guests who booked through third-party sites (Expedia, Booking.com, etc.), a third-party confirmation number will not automatically connect in the Caesars Rewards app. Return the standard response below: the Front Desk links the reservation to the guest's Caesars Rewards account at check-in, and stays booked through a third party do not earn Caesars Rewards points. Informational only β no escalation. Consistent with
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-faq-casino-and-rewards.md,flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-faq-services-and-amenities.md, andflamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-faq-hotel-policies.md.
Any guest message that mentions the Caesars Rewards app, the "Caesars App", or an app problem (can't log in, reservation or confirmation number not showing, app not connecting) gets the standard response below. This is informational β do not escalate.
| Standard response β send for any app issue / Caesars App mention: "Since you booked through [shopping-site], your confirmation number won't automatically connect in the Caesars Rewards app. Our Front Desk team will be happy to link your reservation to your Caesars Rewards account when you check in. Please note that stays booked through a third party do not qualify for Caesars Rewards points however." |
|---|
[shopping-site] is the guest's booking channel (e.g., Expedia, Booking.com) β fill it from the reservation.Source: 3
Score Β· 54.67%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Flamingo Las Vegas guest messages where the guest's message contains a phone number β i.e. the guest supplies a phone number (their own cell / mobile, a callback number, an alternate contact, or someone else's) or asks to be called or texted at a number (e.g. "Please call me at (702) 555-0199."). The Flamingo automated assistant operates on text-messaging and post-stay review channels and cannot place or receive phone calls or SMS; a guest sharing a personal phone number is requesting β explicitly or implicitly β direct human or voice contact, and is supplying personal contact information (PII) that a person must handle. Every guest message that contains a phone number is therefore an immediate, always-on escalation to a human Concierge. Maps to risk category CUSTOMER PHONE NUMBER (tag CUSTOMER-PHONE-NUMBER) in the master Flamingo Risk Management Framework (
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-escalations.md). All matches require immediate escalation. Do not call or text the number, and do not repeat the full number back in a public reply β acknowledge and route to a human.
Trigger keywords (non-exhaustive): call me at, reach me at, text me at, my number is, my cell is, my mobile is, here's my number, you can reach me on, call my [husband / wife / assistant] at, call me back, give me a call β plus any digit sequence formatted as a phone number in the guest's message: (NPA) NXX-XXXX, NPA-NXX-XXXX, NPA.NXX.XXXX, 7-digit NXX-XXXX, international +CC β¦ / +1 NPA NXX XXXX, or a bare 10-/11-digit run.
Disambiguation: This category fires when the guest supplies or shares a phone number (or asks to be contacted at one). A guest asking for the property's phone number ("what's the front-desk / pool / spa number?") is a routine information request β answer from
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-property-details.md, do not tag here. Do not over-trigger on non-phone digit strings: reservation / confirmation numbers, Caesars Rewards numbers, room numbers, dates, and dollar amounts are not phone numbers. Tag only when the digits are presented as a phone / contact number or paired with a call/text request. When a message both shares a number and raises another issue (billing, safety, complaint), apply both tags.
Thank the guest and let them know a team member will follow up. Send a holding reply only (e.g. "Thank you β I've passed your details to our team and someone will be in touch."). Never state that a call or text has been placed, returned, or scheduled for a specific time; do not call or text the number yourself; and do not echo or repeat the full phone number back in the reply β especially on a public review channel β treat it as private contact information.
Do not call or text the guest and do not promise a specific callback time. The LLM is authorized to acknowledge only. Capture in the escalation record: the guest's exact wording, the phone number provided and whose number it is (guest / spouse / assistant), any preferred call or text window, the reason they want to be contacted, the inbound channel, and full reservation details β so the Concierge can make voice/SMS contact.
[CUSTOMER-PHONE-NUMBER] + [TIER LEVEL] + [CHANNEL: Expedia] and route to the Flamingo Concierge queue with priority flag.This response was not escalated. Was that decision correct?
Marked correct
Set by the preferred response below β saving a correction marks it incorrect, clearing the correction marks it correct.
Marked incorrect
Optionally provide a better response. Saving non-empty text marks the LLM response incorrect; clearing it marks the LLM response correct.