Guest message
Received Β· Jun 16, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
Hi, I talked with a bot on Expedia and the check-in name should have been changed to my mothers. I only ask because I am not 21 yet and needed her to check in for me. Thanks.
Expedia Β· Message
Received Β· Jun 16, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
Hi, I talked with a bot on Expedia and the check-in name should have been changed to my mothers. I only ask because I am not 21 yet and needed her to check in for me. Thanks.
Sent Β· Jun 16, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
Thank you for reaching out to us. Since you booked through Expedia, please contact their customer service directly to modify your reservation. They will be able to assist you with changing the check-in name to your mother's. We look forward to welcoming you to Paris Las Vegas Resort & Casino.
Source: 1
Score Β· 63.62%These rules apply to routine guest-service requests that arrive via message. The LLM should acknowledge professionally, provide any information it can, and escalate when the situation requires human action or decision-making.
Trigger Phrases
| β LLM Responds Directly | β Escalate to Human Concierge |
|---|---|
| Collect the additional guest's name. Explain that a valid government-issued photo ID and the card used to book are required at check-in. Note the request with full reservation details. | Guest wants to change the PRIMARY guest name. Guest wants a guarantee that another person can check in without the booker present. Any billing authorization, third-party payment, or identity mismatch. |
Trigger Phrases
| Adding nights is NOT a modification β do not send the guest to Expedia. If the guest wants to ADD nights, stay longer, or move their checkout / departure date later, treat it as a Stay Extension upsell β ask for the best phone number and escalate when supplied. The third-party "contact Expedia" rule below applies only to shortening, cancelling, date shifts, or room-type changes. |
|---|
| Adding a guest's NAME is NOT a modification β handle it directly, do not send to Expedia. If the guest wants to add an additional guest's name for check-in (even on a third-party booking), follow item E β collect the additional guest's full name and explain that a government-issued photo ID and the card used to book are required at check-in (names are typically added up to 24 hours before arrival). Only a change to the PRIMARY guest name, or a cancellation, goes through the booking channel. |
|---|
| Before escalating β always tell the guest: If the reservation was made through a 3rd-party booking channel (Expedia, Booking.com), the guest must contact that platform's customer service directly to modify or cancel. The LLM cannot make these changes. |
|---|
| β LLM Responds Directly | β Escalate to Human Concierge |
|---|---|
| Explain the modification policy based on booking channel (the guest must contact the third party to modify). Direct guest to the appropriate channel (Expedia, Booking.com, or Caesars direct). Adding an additional guest's name for check-in is handled directly β see item E. | 3rd-party booking cannot process the modification. The PRIMARY guest name, dates, room type, or confirmation structure must change and the channel cannot assist. Complex booking complications requiring hotel intervention. |
Trigger Phrases
Source: 2
Score Β· 62.80%Use this table as a fast lookup for any incoming guest message. Find the request type, confirm whether the LLM handles it or escalates, and identify the specific trigger that activates the escalation.
| Request / Scenario | LLM Response | Escalation Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Early Check-In | Share $60 + tax fee, explain availability | Guest confirms they want to pay β then escalate |
| Late Check-Out | Share fee schedule, explain availability option | Guest confirms fee + desired time β then escalate |
| Connecting Rooms | Explain $20/room/night fee, request names & conf #s | Guest confirms fee + provides all names & conf #s β then escalate |
| Room Upgrade / Extend Stay (incl. adding a night or a later checkout) | Ask for best contact phone number; do not route to the booking channel | Guest provides phone number β then escalate |
| Fee / Charge Confirmation (any) | Thank guest, acknowledge the accepted fee; do not apply the charge or guarantee the add-on | Guest accepts/authorizes any fee or surcharge β always escalate (CONFIRM-FEE) |
| Name Addition / Alt Check-In | Collect name, explain ID/card requirements | Primary name change, billing auth, identity mismatch |
| Stay Modification / Cancel (shorten, cancel, date shift, room change, primary-name change β not adding nights or an additional guest name) | Explain 3rd-party policy, direct to booking channel | 3rd party cannot process; complex booking changes |
| Invoice / Folio / Receipt (incl. itemized) | Send the self-service folio response (emailed after checkout; check spam; else caesars.com folio-request link) | Billing dispute / correction / refund; business-invoice format; incidentals hold past timeframe |
| Room Issue / Housekeeping | Apologize, gather details, direct to front desk first | Front desk unresponsive; safety impact; comp requested |
| Maintenance Request | Acknowledge, direct to front desk / Laurel text | Front desk unresponsive; repair still needed |
| Noise / Safety Complaint | Acknowledge, direct to Security / front desk | Security/front desk intervention needed; unresolved |
| Billing Inquiry / Dispute / Refund | Acknowledge, collect details | Any correction, dispute, or refund β always escalate |
| General Complaint / Comp | Empathize, document thoroughly | Compensation requested; multiple failures; emotional guest |
| Post-Stay Review β Negative | Acknowledge publicly with empathy template | Safety, discrimination, viral-risk β escalate within 12h |
| Post-Stay Review β Positive | Respond with standard thank-you template | No escalation required |
Source: 3
Score Β· 58.76%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Paris Las Vegas Resort Casino guest messages where the guest (a) requests a reply by email ("can you email me?", "reply to my email", "what's your email?", "I'll send you my email") or (b) sends an email address β including a platform-REDACTED token that looks like an email, e.g.
----@--------.---,****@*****.***,xxxx@xxxxx.xxx(third-party booking channels such as Expedia / Booking.com auto-mask email addresses in guest messages, so a redacted-email token signals the guest tried to share their email). The automated assistant operates on the booking channel's text-messaging and post-stay review threads and cannot send or receive email, and because the reservation was made through a third-party provider the property has no direct email relationship with the guest β so email communication is not possible. The assistant sends the standard reply stating this (booking made through a third-party provider) and escalates to a human Concierge. Maps to tag EMAIL-CONTACT; part of the master framework inparis-las-vegas-resort-casino-escalations.md. A guest simply asking for the property's general contact info for a routine reason is handled fromparis-las-vegas-resort-casino-property-details.md. Always escalate on trigger; do not email the guest and do not echo a full real email address back in a public reply.
This response was not escalated. Was that decision correct?
Marked correct
Set by the preferred response below β saving a correction marks it incorrect, clearing the correction marks it correct.
Not yet assessed
Optionally provide a better response. Saving non-empty text marks the LLM response incorrect; clearing it marks the LLM response correct.