Guest message
Received Β· Jun 17, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
Is FLVlH6VRB7 the correct confirmation code?
Expedia Β· Message
Received Β· Jun 17, 2026, 2:51 a.m.
Is FLVlH6VRB7 the correct confirmation code?
Sent Β· Jun 17, 2026, 2:52 a.m.
Thank you for reaching out. Please let us know if you need any assistance with verifying your confirmation number.
Source: 1
Score Β· 57.80%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Flamingo Las Vegas guest messages where the guest confirms, accepts, authorizes, agrees to, or approves a fee or charge β as opposed to disputing one. Covers acceptance of a quoted surcharge or add-on cost: adjoining / connecting room fees, room upgrades, early check-in or late checkout fees, resort fees, parking, pet fees, rollaway bed or extra-guest charges, extra-night charges, and any "per room / per night" or "extra fee" the guest agrees to pay (e.g. "Yes, we'd like to confirm the adjoining rooms for the extra fee of $25 per room, per night."). The LLM cannot process payments, apply charges, or guarantee paid add-ons or availability, so every confirmation must be handed to a human to action. Maps to risk category FEE & CHARGE CONFIRMATION (tag CONFIRM-FEE) in the master Flamingo Risk Management Framework (
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-escalations.md). All matches require immediate escalation. Do not confirm the charge is applied or the add-on secured β acknowledge and route to a human.
Trigger keywords (non-exhaustive): yes please confirm, we'd like to confirm, go ahead and charge, charge me, charge my card, add it to my bill, add it to my room, accept the fee, agree to the charge, agree to the fee, approve the fee, okay to charge, that's fine charge, proceed with the upgrade, confirm the extra fee, extra fee, additional charge, additional cost, surcharge, add-on, per night, per room, willing to pay, sounds good charge me, confirm the [adjoining / connecting] rooms.
Disambiguation: This category is for a guest accepting / authorizing a new or quoted charge (a forward-looking action that must be executed by a human). If the guest is disputing, questioning, or asking to remove an existing charge, that is a billing dispute β see General Escalation Rules Β§K (Billing Issues & Charge Disputes). When a message both accepts a fee and disputes another, apply both tags.
Thank the guest for confirming and acknowledge the specific fee/charge they accepted. Never state that the charge has been applied, the payment processed, or the room / upgrade / add-on secured; do not quote, adjust, or negotiate the amount, or guarantee availability. Make clear that a team member will finalize the arrangement and apply the charge. The LLM is not authorized to process payments or confirm paid add-ons.
Do not apply, process, or confirm the charge, and do not guarantee the booking change. The LLM is authorized to acknowledge and thank only. Capture the guest's exact wording in the escalation record β the specific charge accepted, the amount, the unit (per room / per night / one-time), what it is for (adjoining / connecting rooms, upgrade, pet, parking, late checkout, extra guest, rollaway, extra night), and full reservation details β so the concierge can apply the charge and confirm the arrangement.
[CONFIRM-FEE] + [TIER LEVEL] + [CHANNEL: Expedia] and route to the Flamingo Concierge queue with priority flag.Source: 2
Score Β· 52.28%RAG Context: Master escalation framework for Flamingo Las Vegas automated guest messaging and post-stay reviews. Defines the core operating principle (the LLM handles routine information and upsell conversations up to β but not including β the moment a guest commits or a sensitive situation arises, then sends a holding reply and generates a human-Concierge escalation email), the required fields for every escalation email, and a quick-reference decision table. Detailed decision rules live in the companion documents:
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-upsell-escalations.md(Section 1),flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-general-escalations.md(Section 2), andflamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-review-response-escalations.md(Section 3). Serious guest-reported incidents (injury, theft, health, security, harassment, hygiene, legal) route through the detailed risk-category guides listed below; any guest confirmation or acceptance of a fee or charge routes through the always-escalate fee-confirmation guide (CONFIRM-FEE).
Escalation decision rules for automated guest messaging and post-stay reviews.
This framework trains the LLM automated concierge system on exactly two things:
| Core operating principle: The LLM handles routine information requests and upsell conversations up to β but not including β the moment a guest commits or a sensitive situation arises. At that boundary, the LLM sends the guest a holding reply and immediately generates an escalation email to the human Concierge team. |
|---|
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-upsell-escalations.md (Early Check-In, Late Check-Out, Connecting Rooms, Room Upgrade / Stay Extension). Escalate only after confirmed guest intent to purchase/proceed.flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-general-escalations.md (Name Additions, Stay Modifications, Invoice/Folio, Room Issues, Maintenance, Noise/Safety, Billing, General Complaints).flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-review-response-escalations.md (positive and negative/mixed review handling and escalation triggers).For serious guest-reported incidents, route using the risk-category guides (all are always-escalate):
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-safety-injury-escalations.md β Safety & physical harm (SAFETY-INJURY)flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-security-theft-escalations.md β Theft & property crime (SECURITY-THEFT)flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-health-medical-escalations.md β Health & medical (HEALTH-MEDICAL)flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-security-safety-escalations.md β Security & unsafe conditions (SECURITY-SAFETY)flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-conduct-harassment-escalations.md β Harassment & conduct (CONDUCT-HR)flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-hygiene-hazard-escalations.md β Hygiene & environmental (HYGIENE-HAZARD)flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-legal-threat-escalations.md β Legal threats (LEGAL-FLAG)One additional always-escalate guide covers a guest commitment rather than a harm incident:
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-confirm-fee-escalations.md β Fee & charge confirmation (CONFIRM-FEE) β guest accepts/authorizes any fee or surcharge; catch-all backing the Section 1 upsell rows belowUse this table as a fast lookup for any incoming guest message. Find the request type, confirm whether the LLM handles it or escalates, and identify the specific trigger that activates the escalation.
| Request / Scenario | LLM Response | Escalation Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Early Check-In | Share $60 + tax fee, explain availability | Guest confirms they want to pay β then escalate |
| Late Check-Out | Share fee schedule, explain availability option | Guest confirms fee + desired time β then escalate |
| Connecting Rooms | Explain $25/room/night fee, request names & conf #s | Guest confirms fee + provides all names & conf #s β then escalate |
| Room Upgrade / Extend Stay (incl. adding a night or a later checkout) | Ask for best contact phone number; do not route to the booking channel | Guest provides phone number β then escalate |
| Fee / Charge Confirmation (any) | Thank guest, acknowledge the accepted fee; do not apply the charge or guarantee the add-on | Guest accepts/authorizes any fee or surcharge β always escalate (CONFIRM-FEE) |
| Name Addition / Alt Check-In | Collect name, explain ID/card requirements | Primary name change, billing auth, identity mismatch |
| Stay Modification / Cancel (shorten, cancel, date shift, room change, primary-name change β not adding nights or an additional guest name) | Explain 3rd-party policy, direct to booking channel | 3rd party cannot process; complex booking changes |
| Invoice / Folio / Receipt (incl. itemized) | Send the self-service folio response (emailed after checkout; check spam; else caesars.com folio-request link) | Billing dispute / correction / refund; business-invoice format; incidentals hold past timeframe |
| Room Issue / Housekeeping | Apologize, gather details, direct to front desk first | Front desk unresponsive; safety impact; comp requested |
| Maintenance Request | Acknowledge, direct to front desk / Laurel text | Front desk unresponsive; repair still needed |
| Noise / Safety Complaint | Acknowledge, direct to Security (702-733-3523) | Security/front desk intervention needed; unresolved |
| Billing Inquiry / Dispute / Refund | Acknowledge, collect details | Any correction, dispute, or refund β always escalate |
| General Complaint / Comp | Empathize, document thoroughly | Compensation requested; multiple failures; emotional guest |
| Post-Stay Review β Negative | Acknowledge publicly with empathy template | Safety, discrimination, viral-risk β escalate within 12h |
| Post-Stay Review β Positive | Respond with standard thank-you template | No escalation required |
Source: 3
Score Β· 51.73%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Flamingo Las Vegas guest messages where the guest's message contains a phone number β i.e. the guest supplies a phone number (their own cell / mobile, a callback number, an alternate contact, or someone else's) or asks to be called or texted at a number (e.g. "Please call me at (702) 555-0199."). The Flamingo automated assistant operates on text-messaging and post-stay review channels and cannot place or receive phone calls or SMS; a guest sharing a personal phone number is requesting β explicitly or implicitly β direct human or voice contact, and is supplying personal contact information (PII) that a person must handle. Every guest message that contains a phone number is therefore an immediate, always-on escalation to a human Concierge. Maps to risk category CUSTOMER PHONE NUMBER (tag CUSTOMER-PHONE-NUMBER) in the master Flamingo Risk Management Framework (
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-escalations.md). All matches require immediate escalation. Do not call or text the number, and do not repeat the full number back in a public reply β acknowledge and route to a human.
Trigger keywords (non-exhaustive): call me at, reach me at, text me at, my number is, my cell is, my mobile is, here's my number, you can reach me on, call my [husband / wife / assistant] at, call me back, give me a call β plus any digit sequence formatted as a phone number in the guest's message: (NPA) NXX-XXXX, NPA-NXX-XXXX, NPA.NXX.XXXX, 7-digit NXX-XXXX, international +CC β¦ / +1 NPA NXX XXXX, or a bare 10-/11-digit run.
Disambiguation: This category fires when the guest supplies or shares a phone number (or asks to be contacted at one). A guest asking for the property's phone number ("what's the front-desk / pool / spa number?") is a routine information request β answer from
flamingo-las-vegas-hotel-casino-property-details.md, do not tag here. Do not over-trigger on non-phone digit strings: reservation / confirmation numbers, Caesars Rewards numbers, room numbers, dates, and dollar amounts are not phone numbers. Tag only when the digits are presented as a phone / contact number or paired with a call/text request. When a message both shares a number and raises another issue (billing, safety, complaint), apply both tags.
Thank the guest and let them know a team member will follow up. Send a holding reply only (e.g. "Thank you β I've passed your details to our team and someone will be in touch."). Never state that a call or text has been placed, returned, or scheduled for a specific time; do not call or text the number yourself; and do not echo or repeat the full phone number back in the reply β especially on a public review channel β treat it as private contact information.
Do not call or text the guest and do not promise a specific callback time. The LLM is authorized to acknowledge only. Capture in the escalation record: the guest's exact wording, the phone number provided and whose number it is (guest / spouse / assistant), any preferred call or text window, the reason they want to be contacted, the inbound channel, and full reservation details β so the Concierge can make voice/SMS contact.
[CUSTOMER-PHONE-NUMBER] + [TIER LEVEL] + [CHANNEL: Expedia] and route to the Flamingo Concierge queue with priority flag.This response was not escalated. Was that decision correct?
Marked correct
Set by the preferred response below β saving a correction marks it incorrect, clearing the correction marks it correct.
Not yet assessed
Optionally provide a better response. Saving non-empty text marks the LLM response incorrect; clearing it marks the LLM response correct.