Guest message
Received Β· Jun 18, 2026, 4:37 a.m.
Iβd like to cancel this booking
Expedia Β· Message
Received Β· Jun 18, 2026, 4:37 a.m.
Iβd like to cancel this booking
Sent Β· Jun 18, 2026, 4:37 a.m.
Thank you for reaching out to us about your request to cancel your booking. Since you booked through Expedia, please contact their customer service team to initiate any changes or cancellations to your reservation. We appreciate your understanding, and we hope to have the opportunity to serve you in the future.
Source: 1
Score Β· 57.59%Use this table as a fast lookup for any incoming guest message. Find the request type, confirm whether the LLM handles it or escalates, and identify the specific trigger that activates the escalation.
| Request / Scenario | LLM Response | Escalation Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Early Check-In | Share $60 + tax fee, explain availability | Guest confirms they want to pay β then escalate |
| Late Check-Out | Share fee schedule, explain availability option | Guest confirms fee + desired time β then escalate |
| Connecting Rooms | Explain $20/room/night fee, request names & conf #s | Guest confirms fee + provides all names & conf #s β then escalate |
| Room Upgrade / Extend Stay (incl. adding a night or a later checkout) | Ask for best contact phone number; do not route to the booking channel | Guest provides phone number β then escalate |
| Fee / Charge Confirmation (any) | Thank guest, acknowledge the accepted fee; do not apply the charge or guarantee the add-on | Guest accepts/authorizes any fee or surcharge β always escalate (CONFIRM-FEE) |
| Name Addition / Alt Check-In | Collect name, explain ID/card requirements | Primary name change, billing auth, identity mismatch |
| Stay Modification / Cancel (shorten, cancel, date shift, room change, primary-name change β not adding nights or an additional guest name) | Explain 3rd-party policy, direct to booking channel | 3rd party cannot process; complex booking changes |
| Invoice / Folio / Receipt (incl. itemized) | Send the self-service folio response (emailed after checkout; check spam; else caesars.com folio-request link) | Billing dispute / correction / refund; business-invoice format; incidentals hold past timeframe |
| Room Issue / Housekeeping | Apologize, gather details, direct to front desk first | Front desk unresponsive; safety impact; comp requested |
| Maintenance Request | Acknowledge, direct to front desk / Laurel text | Front desk unresponsive; repair still needed |
| Noise / Safety Complaint | Acknowledge, direct to Security / front desk | Security/front desk intervention needed; unresolved |
| Billing Inquiry / Dispute / Refund | Acknowledge, collect details | Any correction, dispute, or refund β always escalate |
| General Complaint / Comp | Empathize, document thoroughly | Compensation requested; multiple failures; emotional guest |
| Post-Stay Review β Negative | Acknowledge publicly with empathy template | Safety, discrimination, viral-risk β escalate within 12h |
| Post-Stay Review β Positive | Respond with standard thank-you template | No escalation required |
Source: 2
Score Β· 52.44%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Paris Las Vegas Resort Casino guest messages where the guest confirms, accepts, authorizes, agrees to, or approves a fee or charge β as opposed to disputing one. Covers acceptance of a quoted surcharge or add-on cost: connecting / adjoining room fees, room upgrades, early check-in or late check-out fees, resort fees, parking, pet fees, rollaway bed or extra-guest charges, extra-night charges, and any "per room / per night" or "extra fee" the guest agrees to pay (e.g. "Yes, we'd like to confirm the adjoining rooms for the extra fee of $20 per room, per night."). The LLM cannot process payments, apply charges, or guarantee paid add-ons or availability, so every confirmation is ALWAYS escalated to a human Concierge to action. Maps to tag CONFIRM-FEE; this is the catch-all backing the Section 1 upsell rules in
paris-las-vegas-resort-casino-upsell-escalations.md. Part of the master framework inparis-las-vegas-resort-casino-escalations.md.
Disambiguation: This tag is for a guest accepting / authorizing a new or quoted charge (a forward-looking action a human must execute). A guest disputing, questioning, or asking to remove an existing charge is a billing issue β see Section 2 General Escalation Rules (Billing). Apply both tags when a message does both.
Thank the guest and acknowledge the specific fee/charge they accepted, then send a holding reply that a team member is arranging it (e.g. "Thank you for confirming! We're arranging this now and will follow up to confirm."). Do not state the charge has been applied or the room / upgrade / add-on is secured, and do not quote, adjust, or negotiate the amount.
This is ALWAYS escalated. Do not apply, process, or confirm the charge, and do not guarantee the booking change. Capture the guest's exact wording β the specific charge accepted, the amount, the unit (per room / per night / one-time), what it is for (connecting / adjoining rooms, upgrade, pet, parking, late check-out, extra guest, rollaway, extra night), and full reservation details β so the Concierge can apply the charge and confirm the arrangement.
Source: 3
Score Β· 52.25%RAG Context: Escalation guideline for Paris Las Vegas Resort Casino guest messages where the guest (a) requests a reply by email ("can you email me?", "reply to my email", "what's your email?", "I'll send you my email") or (b) sends an email address β including a platform-REDACTED token that looks like an email, e.g.
----@--------.---,****@*****.***,xxxx@xxxxx.xxx(third-party booking channels such as Expedia / Booking.com auto-mask email addresses in guest messages, so a redacted-email token signals the guest tried to share their email). The automated assistant operates on the booking channel's text-messaging and post-stay review threads and cannot send or receive email, and because the reservation was made through a third-party provider the property has no direct email relationship with the guest β so email communication is not possible. The assistant sends the standard reply stating this (booking made through a third-party provider) and escalates to a human Concierge. Maps to tag EMAIL-CONTACT; part of the master framework inparis-las-vegas-resort-casino-escalations.md. A guest simply asking for the property's general contact info for a routine reason is handled fromparis-las-vegas-resort-casino-property-details.md. Always escalate on trigger; do not email the guest and do not echo a full real email address back in a public reply.
This response was not escalated. Was that decision correct?
Not yet assessed
Set by the preferred response below β saving a correction marks it incorrect, clearing the correction marks it correct.
Not yet assessed
Optionally provide a better response. Saving non-empty text marks the LLM response incorrect; clearing it marks the LLM response correct.